How many KA210 and KA220 applications can we submit as coordinator or partner?
A good project idea alone is not enough. During the application phase, many organisations ask a very basic question: how many applications are we actually allowed to submit — as a coordinator or as a partner?
For application rounds under Key Action 2, clear participation limits apply. These so-called capping rules are designed to ensure that funding is distributed across as many organisations as possible, rather than being dominated by a small number of applicants. Organisations unfamiliar with these rules — or that interpret them incorrectly — risk unnecessary rejections or strategic mistakes.
KA210 — Small-scale Partnerships: clear and strict limits
For KA210 applications in school education, vocational education and training, adult education, and youth, binding upper limits apply per application round.
| Rule | Limit |
|---|---|
| Maximum applications as coordinator | 1 per application round |
| Maximum total participations (coordinator + partner combined) | 5 per application round |
| Does the sector matter? | No — all sectors count towards the same limit |
| Does the role matter? | No — coordinators and partners are counted equally |
KA220 — Cooperation Partnerships: differentiated rules by sector
For KA220 applications, the rules are more differentiated and depend on the education sector.
School education, VET, adult education, and youth
| Rule | Limit |
|---|---|
| Maximum total participations per application round | 10 per OID |
| Does the role (coordinator vs partner) matter? | No — all participations count equally |
| Does the topic or sector matter? | No — all count towards the same limit |
Higher education (KA220-HED)
A special rule applies in higher education: there is no formal upper limit on the number of KA220-HED applications per OID. However, this flexibility is not unlimited.
What this means for your application strategy
The capping rules make one thing clear: strategy matters more than quantity. Instead of submitting many applications in parallel, it is worth setting clear priorities:
- ✓Which role is realistic for your organisation — coordinator or partner?
- ✓Which projects genuinely match your expertise and thematic focus?
- ✓Where are sufficient capacities available — not only for the application phase, but for implementation?
- ✓Are you close to a participation limit, and if so, which applications offer the best chances?
Especially when success rates are low, a clearly focused and well-prepared application can be more promising than several average participations that spread your team too thin.
Conclusion
Clear participation limits apply across Key Action 2. KA210 is strongly restricted — both for coordinators and for partners. KA220 offers more flexibility, especially in higher education, but requires a realistic assessment of your organisation's own capacity.
Organisations that understand these rules early and factor them into project planning can avoid formal errors and allocate their resources strategically — focusing effort where the chances of success are genuinely highest.
Try it yourself
Generate your complete application draft for free and see how these principles work in practice.
Generate my draft →