← Back to Blog
Programme Guide

Funding and budget planning for Erasmus+ KA2 — your complete guide

erasmusplus.ai9 min readAugust 2025

Well-thought-out budget planning is an essential part of a successful Erasmus+ KA2 application. The budget must be realistically calculated, strategically distributed, and comprehensibly justified. As Erasmus+ funding is based on the lump-sum principle, the budget structure differs from traditional funding programmes — and requires a different planning approach.

Why well-thought-out budget planning is crucial

An unclear or unrealistic budget can lead to your application being rejected. Evaluators carefully check whether the requested funds are proportional to the planned activities and whether the budget is strategically distributed among the partner organisations.

Most common mistake: Over- or undersized budgets — either requesting funds for unnecessary items, or leaving central project areas chronically under-resourced. Both signal poor planning to evaluators.

Realistic budget planning demonstrates that resources are managed efficiently and that all planned measures can be carried out with the available funds. It also helps to avoid financial bottlenecks during implementation.

How does Erasmus+ lump-sum funding work?

In contrast to detailed cost accounting, KA2 funding is based on lump sums. Project partners receive the approved amount if they demonstrably implement the agreed work packages and results. Individual invoicing of each expenditure is not required — what matters is that project activities are carried out as planned and documented.

Key principle: The approved funding amount is calculated according to project size and duration, number of partner organisations, and the type and scope of planned activities — not against a detailed cost breakdown.

Funding amounts by project type

Project typeAvailable lump sums
Small-Scale Partnerships (KA210)€30,000 or €60,000
Cooperation Partnerships (KA220)€120,000, €250,000, or €400,000

Small-Scale Partnerships are designed for smaller organisations with limited resources — with simplified application and administrative requirements. Cooperation Partnerships allow a wider reach and more ambitious goals. The chosen funding amount should realistically match the planned project scope: requesting €400,000 for a project that can be delivered for €120,000 raises immediate red flags with evaluators.

Budget structure and work packages

Divide your planned activities into meaningful work packages. Each work package should have a clear objective and be linked to specific budget areas:

Budget areaWhat is covered
Project management & implementationCoordination, meetings, administrative costs
Transnational meetingsTravel and accommodation for partner meetings
Learning, teaching & training activitiesTraining, workshops, digital tools
Dissemination & sustainabilityPR, publications, multiplier events

A clearly defined budget structure not only helps during the application but also makes project implementation and reporting significantly easier later on.

Calculating costs realistically

Estimating costs accurately is one of the most challenging aspects of budget planning. Work through each project phase and ask:

  • What resources are required for each project phase?
  • What are realistic travel expenses for transnational meetings?
  • Do you need freelancers, trainers, or external service providers — and what do they cost?
  • What are the costs for materials, licences, or digital infrastructure?

As a rough guide for a mid-size Cooperation Partnership, a sensible allocation might look like this:

Project management and coordination30%
Travel and mobility20%
Education and training measures25%
Dissemination and communication15%
External services and evaluation10%

Indicative only — actual allocation depends on project type, scope, and consortium size.

Common stumbling blocks in budget planning

  • Unbalanced distribution between partners — each partner should realistically assess what resources their tasks require; large imbalances prompt evaluator questions
  • Underfunding dissemination — too little for communication, publications, and events means valuable results never reach beyond the consortium
  • Underestimating administrative costs — coordinating a KA2 project requires significant time for meetings, documentation, and reporting
  • Overpromising activities relative to the budget — evaluators compare planned activities to requested amounts and flag incoherence

Budget management after approval

Once funding is approved, precise financial management ensures all partners use funds efficiently. Lump-sum funding does not require a detailed voucher check — but you must document the implementation of planned activities.

  • Create an internal financial plan shared with all partners — who is responsible for which budget lines
  • Coordinate regularly on the use of funds — do not wait until the final report to discover discrepancies
  • Document services provided throughout the project — contemporaneous records are far stronger evidence than retrospective reconstruction
Reporting: Clear financial management not only facilitates project implementation — it substantially simplifies reporting to National Agencies and reduces the risk of payment reductions at project end.

Conclusion

Strategically planned funding is crucial for the success of a KA2 project. A clear structure, realistic cost calculation, and a fair distribution of funds among partner organisations ensure smooth implementation.

Start budget planning early, prioritise transparency and traceability, and align every budget line to a specific work package activity. A budget that tells a coherent story — where every euro is clearly connected to a planned result — is one of the strongest signals of a well-prepared application.

Try it yourself

Generate your complete application draft for free and see how these principles work in practice.

Generate my draft →